Museums: Why We Must Defend Honest History

Why We Must Defend Honest History

History is a complex tapestry of the ugly and the wonderful. It's often uncomfortable, difficult to reconcile, and yet, at its core, it is profoundly amazing. The most important thing we can do, in my opinion, is to continue telling history in an honest and truthful way.

Museums aren't meant to be Hollywood movies. They shouldn't embellish or dramatize stories just to make their exhibits more interesting. While some may find museums "boring," for history enthusiasts like me, they are some of the most exciting places on earth.

A quick look at the Smithsonian's website shows that it's "the world's largest museum, education, and research complex." The Smithsonian dates back to British scientist James Smithson, who left his estate to the United States to found "an establishment for the increase and diffusion of knowledge." This vision, brought to life by James K. Polk, has grown to include 21 museums, the National Zoo, and nine research facilities.

And it's not just the Smithsonian. Across the country, thousands of institutions are dedicated to this same mission. Pennsylvania alone boasts over 1,000 museums, with The Franklin Institute—founded in honor of Benjamin Franklin—being the most visited. Of these, 36 hold accreditation from the American Alliance of Museums (AAM), "the highest national recognition afforded to museums." This accreditation, held by only the top 3% of museums nationwide, signifies a commitment to excellence in areas like collections stewardship, education, and public trust.

Given their vital role, it’s deeply concerning that museums in Washington D.C. and across the country have recently been targeted by the current administration for a sweeping review of their programming. This political scrutiny is a direct challenge to the core standards AAM lists on its website: public trust and accountability, mission, collections stewardship, and intellectual integrity.

A 2020 survey by the American Association for State and Local History (AASLH) found that a stunning 81% of Americans considered history museums and historic sites to be trustworthy. This placed them on par with general museums and well ahead of history textbooks (74%), high school teachers (65%), and the Internet (64%).

I have to wonder: if that same survey were conducted today, what would the results be? Do a majority of Americans now agree with the administration's apparent distrust of our museums? If so, why? Just five years ago, an overwhelming majority had complete faith in our institutions. What changed?







https://www.si.edu/

https://statemuseumpa.org/smaccreditation/

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115056914674717313

https://www.aam-us.org/programs/ethics-standards-and-professional-practices/core-standards-for-museums/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reintroducing Jeremiah Miley Spahr, Sr

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: Week 30

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: Week 6